Health Care

Lessons From The Hoover Policy Boot Camp

Contributing Scholar: Scott Atlas

Rethinking American Healthcare

American health policy is often judged by coverage, spending, and intentions rather than access, quality, and outcomes. From the collapse of trust after COVID to the performance of US healthcare and the case for market-based reform, the central question is how to improve care without sacrificing choice, innovation, or accountability.

Up Next Keynesian Fiscal Stimulus: The Debt and the Payoff

Can Competition Fix American Healthcare?

Comment

Published August 21, 2026

High healthcare costs reflect incentives that separate patients from prices, restrict competition, and limit the supply of care. A more competitive system would give patients greater control over healthcare spending, expand health savings accounts, remove barriers facing providers, and encourage competition in medical services and prescription drugs. The objective is not simply to spend less, but to lower prices without restricting access to treatment or weakening medical innovation.

Check out more from Scott W. Atlas:

Watch "Doctors vs. Bureaucrats: Who Should Control Patient Care" with Scott Atlas here.
Read "The Educated Republic: Scott Atlas on Thomas Jefferson" by Scott Atlas here.
Read "Physician Autonomy and Free Speech" by Scott Atlas here.

Learn more about Scott W. Atlas here.

__________

The opinions expressed in this video are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Hoover Institution or Stanford University.