Back to top

Key Facts

Can Medicare For All Reduce the Cost of Care?
Not So Simple
Currently, Medicaid and Medicare pay health care providers at lower rates than private insurance does. Supporters of Medicare for All argue that by moving to a single-payer system the government could force doctors and hospitals to accept lower payments than they earn now, lowering health care costs for everyone. Unfortunately, this isn’t as simple as it sounds.
Defining the Problem
Because doctors and hospitals earn less for treating Medicare or Medicaid patients, they frequently charge more to people with private insurance. This “cross-subsidy” makes it seem like lower Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement rates could save the country billions of dollars. In reality, somebody is always paying the difference.
Cuts and Consequences
Moving to a single-payer system would mean widely cutting health care payments. This would have an enormous negative impact on the health care industry. Doctors would find their salaries slashed, and many hospitals, particularly in rural areas, could go out of business.
Weighing the Consequences
Single-payer systems would result in fewer health care providers, longer wait times, and lower-quality health care. There are many other ways to lower the cost of health care. Policy makers should be skeptical of proposals that promise to provide savings without acknowledging inevitable reductions in both access to providers and the quality of care.